Let Me Introduce: E.R.I.M.A. (The Equal Rights in Media Amendment)

Firstly, I'm sorry to disappoint you, but,
there are no E.R.I.M.A. Proposals, at this time.
SO, the theme is pure fantasy, or is it?

1) ***************

I can assure you, that such a bill would literally solve all of our problems.
I say this, because, nearly every wide-scale epidemic stems from the Media.
Whether girls are being taught to condemn any boy, for briefly glancing at her.
Or, women being told that they're better off, without a man.
The media is also responsible for girls being total over-achievers.
I make the argument, that, the media has more control over your lives than you'd ever care to imagine.
In fact, they're responsible for the rapid decline in the Caucasian population.
basically, they've brainwashed European ladies to become ruthless and female chauvinistic.

2)***************
These are just a few examples. And, it certainly doesn't stop there.
It just so happens, this is not necessarily a "gender" issue.
You can observe the overall manner in which the Media dictates issues to us.
Whether they're promoting legal doctrine, or, giving preference for homosexuality.
No matter what: people always seem to be fixed upon their ideas.
You might say, they're visually 'captivated' by media imagery.

However, Male-bashing happens to be the primary dilemma.

3)***************
I've always stated clearly: MEDIA INEQUALITY is the singular most important issue.
It doesn't matter which laws or social functions exist. There's nothing more important than being the target of Journalists. It is they, who can constantly remind you of their presence. Journalists can also spend a great deal of time preparing their cover-stories, until it's given a great deal of editing, writing, narration, and video support. Thus, by the time each segment is released, it's always very well-prepared, with a touch of professionalism.
I can assure you, there's nothing worse than being the target of Media inequality.
You can never escape from their clutches. And, each waking hour sees new insults. ---During the course of ones lifetime, Men have endured A Billion 'Slurs', nay, a billion-plex more. The onslaught continues, until no end.
I've stated before: We are constantly being reminded of their presence. This is very demoralizing to every boy, who's forced to endure this punishment.

4)***************
...It's important to remind everyone, that, our boys are faced against entire Armies of Journalists. It's really quite overwhelming. And, of course, we're dealing with qualified experts, who surely know how to play their cards. Would it be paranoid to use the term 'conspiracy'? Please remember, there are literally a million journalists who willingly participate in the protocol. Even those journalists who oppose it, still follow the same cover-stories, as all the others. I've come to call this "Del Facto Special-Interest". For example: Each copy of Newsmax Magazine directs a tremendous deal of attention toward Feminism. Therefore, they're helping to promote them, just by giving routine exposure to these WOmen's Groups.

5)***************
Please remember: Every News program covers the same distinct issues, within the same time-span. In other words: they all talk about the same exact things, at the same exact time. It's a 'group effort'. Every Journalist throughout the media, participates in this massive overkill. this is a form of Organized Crime 'in the digital age'. And, they're able to utilize this power to induce a form of mind-control over society. For example: Most teenage girls exert a distinct personality which is directly influenced to media.

6)***************
Now, let's discuss the Legal Authority imposed by the press. There's a simple expression: "What's News Today, becomes Law Tomorrow". Indeed, they have the power to influence our legislation. Oddly enough, many politicians spend their time watching television. And, it inspires them to address those issues which are presented before them. That's pretty scary. Do you remember the Canadian government taking a position in favor of "same sex marriages"? Their Parliament made this assertion, because there had been a recent Media Campaign dedicated toward this issue. The implications are difficult to gasp. By the way, this really has nothing to do with any specific issue. So, it's irrelevant as to whether or not you support "Gay Marriages". Why didn't you support the idea, several months before it appeared on television? The reason is because, the media was imposing another issue upon us, at that time. And, of course, everybody was talking about it, at the supper table.


----------------------------

7)*************** It seems ridiculous to accuse the media of every wide-scale injustice. however, I will say: they've covered nearly every subject, you could possibly imagine. You name it, they've done it.

8)*************** I was just speaking with a man who's supporting a new Equal Parenting legislation entitled: "Pennsylvania House Bill 2685". This would be a first step in promoting nationwide legislation which guarantees Joint Custody for Both Parents. But, according to my theory, "equal Parenting" laws would actually achieve very little, in protecting men's role in parenting.
Sadly, the Women's Groups would find some other way to create imbalance between the genders. Thus, if Congress introduced 'equal parenting' laws, the media would then encourage women to eliminate fathers, by using other methods. She might begin producing babies, with unknown male lovers. Thus, his identity can never be established. Therefore, he cannot possibly be given joint-custody. Plus, even if laws were made to prevent this, there would still be one final "loophole". There are millions of hostile Male 'Liberals'. And they would gladly be willing to forfeit all legal rights, and act as sperm donors. There are already several known cases, where, hostile MALE 'hippies' offered to become a surrogate fathers, to any woman. And, so long as he signs legal-documentation, all rights to that child will be given to the mother. Therefore, it's impossible to make laws which fully protect the rights-of-Fathers. (Rumor has it, there are actually more Male extremists, than women. And, there's also a higher number of Conservative women.)

9)***************This, once again, brings me to the main-source of every problem. the fault undoubtedly stems from the Media. For, it is they who promote such a wide range of social dogma. It's not unique to any specific issue. But instead, their presence can be felt, at all times.

********************************************
********************************************
********************************************

----------------E.R.I.M.A.------------------

********************************************
********************************************
********************************************

Please support an 'Equal Rights in Media' Law.
This would prohibit any bias remarks from being made against guys in particular. Here are the implications:

----1st) We're NOT just targeting against 'harsh' insults. All bias-articles would be targeted. Our media cannot simply talk exclusively to a female audience.

----2nd) Media bias should be recognized as discrimination on a professional level, as well.

----3rd) this would especially bear meaning for our children's sake.

----4) we must prevent such media abuse from backlashing onto society, in general. Let's face it: Most ladies learn crude behavior from watching it on T.V.

----5) this amendment must be taken to every extreme. therefore, For each & every case where they negatively depict a male criminal, they must also degrade her identity to the same scale. Ironically, this practice has already come to use on a racial scale. (Did you realize, the media manipulates racial truths)

----6) there shall be absolutely no literature which is emotionally supportive to her.

----7) Each & every social praise for her, must be met with an exact equivalent for myself. THUS, For example: the expression "Hi Mom" shall be replaced with "Hi Mom & Dad". and

----8) any dogma pertaining to her "Rights", must me met with an equal length of time spent promoting Male encouragement. ...(does that sound stupid? Well, consider: the REAL reason for teaching 'Women's Issues' is to boost the morale of our female students. Really! Nothing more, nothing less.

Therefore, we should list dozens of 'Men's Activists' in our classrooms, in order to balance the difference. Or, better yet, let's remove her "status of Glory" altogether.

----9) All forms of special interest must end, nomatter how trivial. So, is an 'E.R.I.M.A.' Amendment really so far fetched?


*************************
*************************

This issue outweighs everything else:
Simply because, the media combines everything together.
Therefore, they're given influence over countless venues.


Now, let me say a few final word regarding E.R.I.M.A.:
this is one "proposal" which cannot possibly fail.
You heard that remark correctly.
The reason is simple: Even though such proposed legislation would definitely fail,
.....it would then become the equivalent to acknowledging their guilt.

In other words: an "Equal Rights in Media" bill would surely fail.
However, those who dismissed the legislation must then explain their reasons.
which would, more-or-less, prove my case.
The media is totally biased against men.
And, this attitude reflects public consensus, as well.



**********************

SO, IN CONCLUSION:

I WOULD BE VERY HAPPY, IF AN "EQUAL RIGHTS in MEDIA AMENDMENT" failed.
Because, you're just admitting that our claims are substantiated.
It's similar to the Equal Parenting laws which Women's Groups firmly opposed.
And, when their unjust motives were questioned,
they provided answers that the "government shouldn't become involved in family affairs".
In other words,
they were not willing to admit that the current system is favorable to the woman.
While still maintaining a position against legal equality, for men.

 

.